To avoid explicitly checking for null values in Java, you can utilize certain techniques and…
What are the differences between a HashMap and a Hashtable in Java?
In Java, both HashMap
and Hashtable
are used to store key-value pairs, but there are several differences between them:
- Thread Safety:
Hashtable
is thread-safe, meaning it is synchronized and can be safely accessed by multiple threads concurrently. On the other hand,HashMap
is not thread-safe by default. If multiple threads access aHashMap
concurrently, and at least one thread modifies it structurally (e.g., adding or removing entries), external synchronization is needed to ensure thread safety. However, you can use theConcurrentHashMap
class, which provides concurrent access without the need for external synchronization. - Null Values and Keys:
HashMap
allows null values and a single null key. In contrast,Hashtable
does not allow null values or null keys. If you attempt to insert a null value into aHashtable
, it will throw aNullPointerException
. - Performance: Due to the thread-safety overhead in
Hashtable
,HashMap
generally performs better in single-threaded environments.HashMap
is not synchronized by default, making it more efficient for situations where synchronization is not required. - Iterators: The iterators provided by
HashMap
are fail-fast, meaning they will throw aConcurrentModificationException
if the underlying collection is modified while iterating. In contrast, the iterators ofHashtable
are not fail-fast. - Legacy:
Hashtable
is a legacy class that was part of the original Java collections framework. It is still supported for backward compatibility, but new code should generally useHashMap
or other newer collections classes.
Given the above differences, HashMap
is commonly used in most scenarios due to its better performance and flexibility. However, if you require thread safety or need to work with legacy code, Hashtable
can be used. Alternatively, you can consider using ConcurrentHashMap
if you require concurrent access and thread safety without the need for external synchronization.
This Post Has 0 Comments